"High court ruling reels in 6th Circuit precedent favoring vesting of retiree benefits"

Article

Following is an excerpt:

In late January the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a case addressing the principles that should apply in deciding whether retiree welfare benefits in a collective bargaining agreement vest so that they survive expiration of the agreement.

The circuits had been split on the issue. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in particular, essentially created an inference in favor of finding such benefits vested, even if a CBA was silent as to the duration of the benefits. UAW v. Yard-Man Inc., 716 F.2d 1476, 1479 (6th Cir. 1983), and its progeny.

Follow Quarles

Subscribe Media Contact
Back to Main Content

We use cookies to provide you with the best user experience on our website and to analyze statistics related to our website. To understand more about how we use cookies, or for instructions to change your preference and browser settings, please see our Privacy Notice. Please note that if you choose to reject cookies, doing so may impair some of our website's functionality.